<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: XSLT template rules vs. Lisp macros</title>
	<atom:link href="http://evanlenz.net/blog/2006/02/19/contemplating-s-expressions-in-bed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://evanlenz.net/blog/2006/02/19/contemplating-s-expressions-in-bed/</link>
	<description>XSLT et cetera</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 22:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: pkhuong</title>
		<link>http://evanlenz.net/blog/2006/02/19/contemplating-s-expressions-in-bed/#comment-35820</link>
		<dc:creator>pkhuong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 13:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evanlenz.net/blog/?p=24#comment-35820</guid>
		<description>The problem with pattern matching dispatch and fixpointing (repeated) application is that it's very easy (imo) to have a hidden infinite loop. Pattern matching also has the problem that rules can be ambiguous, but there are various workarounds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with pattern matching dispatch and fixpointing (repeated) application is that it&#8217;s very easy (imo) to have a hidden infinite loop. Pattern matching also has the problem that rules can be ambiguous, but there are various workarounds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slava Pestov</title>
		<link>http://evanlenz.net/blog/2006/02/19/contemplating-s-expressions-in-bed/#comment-35785</link>
		<dc:creator>Slava Pestov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 20:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evanlenz.net/blog/?p=24#comment-35785</guid>
		<description>Lisp macros (at least in Common Lisp) are procedural -- you write code which manipulates code -- XSLT has a much more declarative feel. You might want to take a look at Scheme's 'hygienic macros' and define-syntax form. It provides the same functionality as CL's macros but it feels more like XSLT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lisp macros (at least in Common Lisp) are procedural &#8212; you write code which manipulates code &#8212; XSLT has a much more declarative feel. You might want to take a look at Scheme&#8217;s &#8216;hygienic macros&#8217; and define-syntax form. It provides the same functionality as CL&#8217;s macros but it feels more like XSLT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
