<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Watching The Atheism Tapes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://evanlenz.net/blog/2009/10/11/watching-the-atheism-tapes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://evanlenz.net/blog/2009/10/11/watching-the-atheism-tapes/</link>
	<description>XSLT et cetera</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 15:53:45 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Evan</title>
		<link>http://evanlenz.net/blog/2009/10/11/watching-the-atheism-tapes/comment-page-1/#comment-43013</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 16:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evanlenz.net/blog/?p=132#comment-43013</guid>
		<description>Such are the perils of absolute statements. :-) It sounds like I should have said &quot;very few&quot; instead of &quot;nobody&quot;.

&quot;not evidence of anything&quot;? Of course it&#039;s evidence of something. Maybe it&#039;s evidence of one of the world&#039;s most successful conspiracies, or evidence of a particular flaw in human nature (tendency to believe in something like God). My point is that it should not be ignored in such discussions. To do so reflects a very narrow sort of inquiry and/or makes one sound immensely ignorant. The widespread existence of belief too has to be addressed (which, to his credit, McGinn does later in the interview in his discussion about &quot;cosmic loneliness&quot;).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Such are the perils of absolute statements. <img src='http://evanlenz.net/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  It sounds like I should have said &#8220;very few&#8221; instead of &#8220;nobody&#8221;.</p>
<p>&#8220;not evidence of anything&#8221;? Of course it&#8217;s evidence of something. Maybe it&#8217;s evidence of one of the world&#8217;s most successful conspiracies, or evidence of a particular flaw in human nature (tendency to believe in something like God). My point is that it should not be ignored in such discussions. To do so reflects a very narrow sort of inquiry and/or makes one sound immensely ignorant. The widespread existence of belief too has to be addressed (which, to his credit, McGinn does later in the interview in his discussion about &#8220;cosmic loneliness&#8221;).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://evanlenz.net/blog/2009/10/11/watching-the-atheism-tapes/comment-page-1/#comment-43012</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 11:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evanlenz.net/blog/?p=132#comment-43012</guid>
		<description>Leaving aside the fact that lots of people believing an incorrect thing for many years is actually not evidence of anything, there /are/ still followers of the ancient greek gods who only in the last few years have been allowed to practice their religion openly in greece.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leaving aside the fact that lots of people believing an incorrect thing for many years is actually not evidence of anything, there /are/ still followers of the ancient greek gods who only in the last few years have been allowed to practice their religion openly in greece.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
